Post by account_disabled on Jan 3, 2024 5:38:44 GMT
Collaboration Disruptive Innovation E-commerce Partners Technology Systems Reposted from: More like this Understanding Tomorrow’s Workforce: Today’s Student Labor Activist Ayanna Howard Artificial Intelligence Ethics at Unilever: From Policy to Process Thomas Davenport and Randy Bean Artificial Intelligence Unleashes New Power for Employees: Are HR Leaders Ready? Josh Bersin's lead in AI remains ahead Abby Lundberg You must be logged in to post a comment. First time here? Sign up for a free account: comment on articles and access more articles. Artificial Intelligence Unleashes New Power for Employees: Are HR Leaders Ready? Josh Bersin's lead in AI remains ahead Abby.
Lundberg You must be logged in to post a comment. First time here? Sign up for a free account: comment on articles and access more articles. Artificial Intelligence Unleashes New Power for Employees: Are HR Leaders Ready? Josh Bersin's lead in AI remains ahead Abby Lundberg You must be logged in to post a comment. First time here? Sign up for a free account: comment on articles and access Job Function Email List more articles.Professionals Charles Green Year Month Day I’m not sure this article lives up to the title. I want to be careful in expressing this, because this study was clearly done carefully by serious people, and it's a valid and interesting hypothesis that, if correct, is a matter of some real interest. But, as I said, I think the case is far from proven. If I read the article carefully, it all depends on some components of one aspect of trust.
This aspect is trustworthiness (as opposed to credibility). The component is empathy. In my opinion, the key passage is this: Trust is a combination of integrity, reliability, and mutual care Mutual care, or the level of empathy one partner has for another, can lead to over-accommodation. In this case, the team member would rather please his partner than his partner. Openly question your partner’s ideas, decisions, and actions. First, I'm not aware of any single agreed-upon definition of trust. This is harder to define than obscenity. Second, the author clearly defines trust but makes no attempt to distinguish between trusting, being trusted, or the proper use of trust, which is the result of the first two. While this is not an unreasonable definition, it is not the only one.
Lundberg You must be logged in to post a comment. First time here? Sign up for a free account: comment on articles and access more articles. Artificial Intelligence Unleashes New Power for Employees: Are HR Leaders Ready? Josh Bersin's lead in AI remains ahead Abby Lundberg You must be logged in to post a comment. First time here? Sign up for a free account: comment on articles and access Job Function Email List more articles.Professionals Charles Green Year Month Day I’m not sure this article lives up to the title. I want to be careful in expressing this, because this study was clearly done carefully by serious people, and it's a valid and interesting hypothesis that, if correct, is a matter of some real interest. But, as I said, I think the case is far from proven. If I read the article carefully, it all depends on some components of one aspect of trust.
This aspect is trustworthiness (as opposed to credibility). The component is empathy. In my opinion, the key passage is this: Trust is a combination of integrity, reliability, and mutual care Mutual care, or the level of empathy one partner has for another, can lead to over-accommodation. In this case, the team member would rather please his partner than his partner. Openly question your partner’s ideas, decisions, and actions. First, I'm not aware of any single agreed-upon definition of trust. This is harder to define than obscenity. Second, the author clearly defines trust but makes no attempt to distinguish between trusting, being trusted, or the proper use of trust, which is the result of the first two. While this is not an unreasonable definition, it is not the only one.